Ringing Forums

It's a good video — Tina

Indeed. Just watched and it is excellent.

to do the job I agree only competence matters. But if you are looking at the big picture, and concerned about the supply of interested people then knowing that half the relevant population is absent could be quite significant.

Ringing World and ART already cover the national space. — Charlotte Boyce

Yes, but a lot of ringers in that space don't receive either.

promoting a sense of community in ringing is the key to what a territorial society is about. People progess in ringing due to who they know so the key thing Branch Officers should do is know th — Charlotte Boyce

Agreed.

I'm not clear what you mean by 'involved in maintenance work'.
In ODG a handful are members of the T&B Committee who do inspections, give advice and run courses. Each branch will have a few people known to be knowledgeable, who will help or give advice if asked. And there are several hundred steeple keepers (or tower captains where there is no separate steeple keeper) who by default do minor maintenance when required, and whose ability and knowledge will vary from minimal to considerable.
So which set are you trying to identify?

up to around 50 territorial ringing societies, all experimenting with different systems, but there is limited sharing of information between societies — Roger Booth

I wouldn't describe what we've been doing successfully for the past 15 years as experimenting.
However I would agree that sharing probably isn't ideal. One of the things the ODG communications working group recognised was the diffriculty of getting our branches to do things in the same way. We didn't even try to solve the problem for other societies. At the time ISTR there was quite a bit of sharing ideas on the ChangeRingers list, but in those days e-communication was still relatively novel - a lot of our members didn't have email so we had to develop systems to cater for those with and without. But now it's been routine for so long we just use it.
See: http://odg.org.uk/sdb/services/#email and http://odg.org.uk/sdb/services/email.html

Whereas there are some grass roots ringers who only ring in their own tower, and not interested in doing more, there are many others who are keen to progress, but unable to do so but unable to progress ... — Roger Booth

In our experience new ringers are very keen, and will take up opportunities to progress if they are offered. It's the ones who are not keen to engage tend to be those who have been around for a god while without making much progress because they haven't had the opportunities.
Our Branch elementary practices are heavily subscribed by people keen not to progress, and the same keen people are over represented at our general practices.
Is it so surprising that someone investing time in taking up a new activity should want to progress? Not really. Is it surprising that anyone still doing something (out of duty or habit) in which they have not progressed should have adapted their expectations to cope with the reality? I don't think so.
So the onus is on us to ensure new ringers have the opportunity and support to make progress, and become competent enough for it to be self fulfilling before the novelty and initial enthusiasm wears off.

rather than the emails which say ‘I’ve been told to forward this to our members’ from a Secretary role with no active knowledge or involvement in the content shared. — Lucy Chandhial

I too dislike those messages, especially if they include lots of administrative padding before you get to the meat, but there are pros and cons. if everything goes to everyone then either they automatically get binned, or worse people opt out of being on the list. In a multi level organisation some messages need to go from top to bottom but not all do.
In out Branch we have several different lists - officers, tower correspondents and members (and some towers have their own members lists). Some of what comes from the Guild (or the CC) is of relevance to officers and some to members so the secretary passes it on accordingly. Likewise some of what she sends is of interest to individual members and some to those managing towers.
When ODG set up a communications working group (in 2006) one of the principles it established was that the best people to judge what to pass on where, and what to act in without passing on, we're those with local knowledge. They are best able to strike the balance to keep everyone informed (and interested) without overloading them or turning them off.
The counter argument is the secretary who passes nothing on, the answer to people who don't do their job is not to be found in technological overkill.
One of the attractive features of integrated mailing lists (as provided by systems like LoveAdmin, MemberMojo, etc) is that it is possible to have more specialised lists, with members opting in or out themselves. That's quite good for things like practice notices,where there is limited overlap between those who attend advanced practices and elementary ones, but less good for other things where there aren't such obvious divisions.

can’t easily email all members unless it’s about renewal of membership, unless we also use MailChimp or equivalent — Lucy Chandhial

Are you sure? We did a trial with MemberMojo and set up some rudimentary email lists with it. There were several shortcomings with the management and naming but it was definitely possible.

there are several. LoveAdmin is used by D&N (and maybe others). When I investigated it it seemed a better match (in terms of managing communication networks) for an organisation with many branches. Others are WebCollect and HiveBrite.

I don't see the link between Member Mojo and the distribution of a grass roots newsletter. Guilds such as my own already have effective email distribution and communication mechanisms in place, at Guild and Branch level (in our case based on MailMan).

Does any one person actually know how many copies of the keys actually exist for your tower? — Mike Shelley

Yes. We have a list and the wardens periodically ask me to conduct a muster for their records. There is onen set per officer plus one set in the church safe. Some sets don't have every key, based on need. Each officer is responsible for his/her set and the wardens are responsible for the set in the safe, which is used for non-ringing access such as fire inspections, roof access, fitting Christmas lights on the tower, etc.

ISTR that the Hawkear recommendation is to be central above the bells, which seems sensible.
It assumes the microphone can handle very high sound levels without distortion. Many years ago using a less robust microphone I found that on the stairs outside the ringing room worked quite well. That might have been helped by the louder bells being further from the door though.

a reasonable guess. Reading again what Tina said I think it is more than that though. The existing mechanisms do their best but one hears criticicisms that they don't always point people in the best direction.
It's not just a matter of pointing to the nearest tower or the nearest ART teacher or whatever. There are lots of factors to consider to make the system work effectively for all parties involved. I did some exploration of the topic back in 2012, see Here
One thing I didn't consider then, but which Tina mentioned explicitly, is the capacity to take on new recruits. Assuming that any tower can at any time take on unlimited recruits is naive, and designing a system on that assumption would be like designing an online shop with no idea of who has what in stock - a recipe for disgruntled customers and harassed shopkeepers.
When Tina says it's a chunky project I assume she is thinking that it will rely on a lot of that knowledge, and quite possibly distributed decision making. Getting that to work will be chunky.

flying the Union Flag upside down being a sign of distress. — Susan Hall

Or incompetence!

Which sorts of place are most at risk? Is is small country parishes with disappearing congregations but strong local community support for the building? Or big Victorian piles built in times of urban expansion where there is n — Simon Linford

That's a good question, pointing to an obvious answer. Now ask which of them is surrounded by a large enough population to be likely to provide a band of ringers? It might not be the one that has enough support to keep the building.

I think it's fairly obvious that 'most' ringers are not the solution to a lot of things. Only a minority have the drive to make things happen, and in fact a lot probably ring more out of duty or habit than being driven by a love of ringing itself. But that's probably true of most things.
In my teens I never thought about the future of ringing, I was just hooked on it and wanted to do as much as I could. In that sense I could be described as selfish and parasitic on what already existed. But my 'selfish' enthusiasm included motivating and teaching lots of other kids to ring, so we had a viable band, and organising lots of quarters and outings that kept the band active.
If we can get people hooked on ringing they will find ways to do things that collectively contribute to the future, even if their motivation is more short term. So the question is how to get enough people hooked on ringing in an expansive way.

l

the biggest draw to our tower website is a page entitled FAMOUS BELLS — Peter Sotheran

Having drawn them to that page do you know how many look at any of the rest of the website - the bits I assume you would like them to look at?

. check them out at: https://sotherans.wixsite.com/stmarks-bellringers . If — Peter Sotheran

That's difficult since it refuses to run on my iPad :-(

On our website we don't mention ag — Phillip George

The fact that ringing is an all age activity is one of its attractions so it's definitely worth mentioning. And the way I mentioned it was quite positive taken on context of the preceding and following sentences. The only problem was the search engine pulling it out of context.

is that comparing like for like? Tristan was talking about towers becoming unavailable for ringing because the church authorities either didn't want it or couldn't support it. From your previous comments I got the Themeside problems were down to failings of the ringing community rather than lack of available towers.