Ringing Forums

I was wondering if anyone these days upholds the CCCBR frame work for Methods , i.e. naming of Methods as an example this method was named with the peal being rung by one ringer and a simulator ringing 7 bells

https://bb.ringingworld.co.uk/view.php?id=1999329

I thought all the ringers had to be real people ?

I note that it recorded on Complib with no indicator that the naming is non compliant

Whilst im not doubting the authenticity of this performance it would be very easy to upload spoof performances and name methods with little recourse

Also saw a 1440 of this alliance method

https://bb.ringingworld.co.uk/view.php?id=1999329

The composition used was false to name it they would need either some form of variable hunt I doubt if such a composition is possible, or more likely ringing it with a method that has a double dodge in 3/4

How many other non complaint named methods are there on Complib and to reiterate my opening question who is managing this ?

Also what if i were to ring the method legally and re name it ?