• Roger Booth
    127
    At the weekend I was with the training officer of one of our larger associations and I asked how many 'learn to ring' enquiries had they received through their association website. The answer was none!

    It does seem that although a lot of effort goes into recording peals and publishing all manner of peal statistics, very little research goes into analysing recruitment and training. My experience is also that guilds and associations are not very transparent about how many enquiries they receive, and very precious about where they are forwarded to. Nor is there any meaningful data on what the conversion rates are. Does your guild/association publish any such data in it's annual report? If so what are they?

    If we are to recruit and train 10,000 additional ringers in the next four years, we need 40,000 enquiries as about half of them will not get as far a visiting a tower and having an initial lesson, and about half of those who have a first lesson will not be ringing two years later. That means about 10,000 initial enquires a year are needed. Divided by about 50 territorial guilds and associations = 200 per year for the average sized society. Do we get anything like that number?

    Fifteen months ago the CCCBR wrote to all its affiliated guilds and associations, asking them to provide a list of contacts in their area to receive learn to ring requests that come through the new CCCBR recruitment portal. Will this work?

    What have we learned since Ring for the King? https://bellringing.org/ring-for-the-king-survey/
  • Lucy Chandhial
    155
    I receive the learning to ring enquiries for the bellringing.London site and therefore receive enquiries mostly related to the Middlesex Association but sometimes beyond. I agree with your approximate stats on the number of enquiries which actually lead to someone who learns.
    Last year we had 60 enquiries (43 in 2024 and 66 in 2023).
    Alongside this I hear of many enquiries made within a specific church, from people who hear the bells whether church goers or not, and are drawn to ask about ringing.

    The Recruitment and Development workgroup held a briefing on 8th Feb that shared a newcomer’s perspective on Association websites and how we could improve the learning to ring accessibility. The slides and recording are available here: R&D briefing slides for recruitment via websites

    It is still obvious to me, from the enquiries I receive, that we don’t always have the teaching capacity to match the enquiries and that the Ring for the King style big uplift in recruits is hard to handle so a steady drip feed is easier to work with.

    I’m sure the recruitment portal will help. But it still relies on local availability of teachers with time to commit so that enquiries are followed up and people are given their best chance to learn.

    We will need more ringers to be willing to learn to teach handling. ART is willing to run the courses to support people to learn to teach but many people shy away from the time commitment or the responsibility / risk factor or both.

    Associations could do a review of which towers are unable to teach new learners and try to address this as a fundamental key to building a band is being able to teach from scratch.
    This is probably more important now than whether or not people get the chance to ring Bristol maximus or how many peals are rung but I agree that our Association Annual Report and committee meetings tend to focus more on the ‘elite’ end of ringing and less on ensuring we will have ringers in the future.
bold
italic
underline
strike
code
quote
ulist
image
url
mention
reveal
youtube
tweet
Add a Comment

Welcome to your Ringing Forums!

If you would like to join in the conversation, please register for an account.

You will only be able to post and/or comment once you have confirmed your email address and been approved by an Admin.